Explicit consent
A saved report will never become a public case automatically. Publication requires a separate, revocable authorization.
Case studies
See how the decision is made.
Three regional scenarios show how evidence becomes—or does not become—a scoring event. Each one separates observable form, interpretation, and what still needs verification.
Current collectionIllustrative composites
These are transparent teaching scenarios, not user testimonials or disguised property reports. They contain no address, coordinate, parcel, private image, or claim of user authorization.
Read the publication standard →01Orientation
Seattle metro, Washington
The formal entrance faced east. The home lived toward the west.
An illustrative Seattle case showing how a rear living facade, glazing, grade, and open outlook can outweigh the front-door bearing when identifying house facing direction.
5 min readRead case →
02Terrain and backing
Boulder foothills, Colorado
Higher ground supported the site—but did not prove the slope was safe.
An illustrative Boulder foothills case separating useful terrain backing and a graded residential platform from unverified geotechnical or wildfire conclusions.
6 min readRead case →
03Road form
Atlanta metro, Georgia
The road formed a T nearby. Its approach axis missed the house.
An illustrative Atlanta case showing how centerline alignment, setback, grade, and vegetation can turn a nearby T-junction into context rather than a direct road-rush penalty.
5 min readRead case →
Publication standard
What will change when verified cases are added
Deliberate redaction
Exact addresses, coordinates, tokens, parcel outlines, and identifying imagery stay outside the public artifact.
Visible provenance
Every future case will say whether it is illustrative or verified anonymous, when it was reviewed, and what remains uncertain.
Read your setting